Only the Son of God could provoke such a response. In fact, the explosive body of ancient literature related to Jesus is a testimony to both His historicity and Divine nature. Given the nature of Jesus and his impact on our world, we should expect to find such a reaction to his life and ministry. There are dozens of ancient non-canonical legends related to Jesus. Why Shouldn’t We Trust What the Non-Canonical Gospels Say About Jesus? We have little reason to accept late re-writes of the life and ministry of Jesus these non-canonical fictions were rejected by the ancients who recognized their late arrival and understood the self-serving motivations of their proponents. Those who sought to change the story of Jesus in antiquity were driven by a desire to validate their theological presuppositions. Once exposed, these foundations can give us even greater confidence the original story of Jesus is early and accurate, even though these late legends are not to be trusted.ĭo the Non-Canonical Gospels Challenge the Historicity of the New Testament? As we sift through the legendary claims, we can expose the true foundations upon which they crafted their stories. What Motivated Early Non-Canonical Writers to Modify the Story of Jesus?Īlthough these late legends contain many exaggerations and lies, they built their myths and fabrications on the foundation of a true account. Information About the General Reliability of the Non-Canonical Textsīefore surveying each text, these articles examine why such texts would be written in the first place and whether or not these documents do anything to invalidate what we know about Jesus from the reliable New Testament manuscripts:
#THE TRUE AUTHORSHIP OF THE NEW TESTAMENT PDF SERIES#
This series of posts will help you understand why such untruths about Jesus were written in the first place, what the documents said about Jesus, and why they were rejected as frauds: My research into the topic resulted in a number of articles that I’ve reproduced here at.
They were written late in history and rejected by everyone who knew the truth about Jesus of Nazareth. These texts were never part of the New Testament canon.
I was disappointed to discover that the book should have been titled, The Well Known, Late Lies About Jesus That Were Ignored By Christians Who Knew Better. I bought the book and bean to research the historical texts it described. “What?” I thought, “There are books about Jesus that were lost?” I couldn’t help but wonder what these books said about Jesus and why they were allegedly “lost” in the first place. As a new investigator of the claims of the New Testament, I was immediately intrigued. Many years ago, when I first became interested in Christianity, I encountered a book at a local bookstore entitled, The Lost Books of the Bible.
0 kommentar(er)
